Mycophenolate mofetil for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although the accepted standard of care for induction of lupus nephritis has been cyclophosphamide, recent trials suggest that mycophenolate mofetil may be as or more effective and less toxic. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the risk for failure to induce remission of lupus nephritis in patients who were treated with mycophenolate mofetil compared with cyclophosphamide. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Studies were identified by a search of electronic databases, bibliographies, and conference proceedings and by contacting experts. Randomized trials that compared mycophenolate mofetil with cyclophosphamide for induction therapy in adults with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis were eligible. The primary outcome was failure to induce a remission of nephritis as defined by the original studies (based on proteinuria, renal function, and urine sediment). RESULTS Four studies that included 268 patients and had homogeneous results across studies were identified. In a fixed-effects model, the pooled relative risk for failure to induce remission for mycophenolate mofetil compared with cyclophosphamide was 0.70. The relative risk for the composite outcome of death or end-stage renal disease for mycophenolate mofetil compared with cyclophosphamide was 0.44. Leukopenia and amenorrhea occurred more frequently in cyclophosphamide-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of lupus nephritis with mycophenolate mofetil compared with cyclophosphamide reduces the risk for failure to induce remission during induction therapy and may reduce the risk for death or end-stage renal disease. Mycophenolate mofetil may be considered as a first-line induction therapy for the treatment of lupus nephritis in patients without severe renal dysfunction.
منابع مشابه
Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for therapy of lupus nephritis: an evidence-based case report from systematic reviews and meta- analyses
Background: The aim of this case study is to compare the effectiveness between cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil to achieve remission of lupus nephritis in an evidence-based case report from meta-analyses. Methods: Method in this case study is evidence-based case report using meta-analyses. Clinical question used in this paper is; which immunosuppressant gives better result in achievin...
متن کاملLupus nephritis: induction therapy in severe lupus nephritis--should MMF be considered the drug of choice?
Severe lupus nephritis is an aggressive disease that requires an aggressive approach to treatment. Recent randomized clinical trials showed that mycophenolate mofetil compared favorably with cyclophosphamide (traditional approach) for remission induction. Consequently, mycophenolate mofetil is now commonly recommended as first-line therapy. Nevertheless, the role of mycophenolate mofetil in tre...
متن کاملEfficacy and adverse events of mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare complete remission and adverse events (that is, infection, leukopenia, and gastrointestinal [GI] symptoms) between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). We identified trials from MEDLINE using the PubMed and Ovid search engines, and from The C...
متن کاملUse of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in lupus nephritis (LN) in children
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease; 86% of children with SLE have renal involvement, that ranges from asymptomatic urinary findings to nephritic syndrome and renal failure. Cyclophosphamide (CYC) and corticosteroids (CCS) has been the standard of care for many years, despite their failure or potential toxicities. Studies have showed good results with MMF in...
متن کاملConcise report Maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis with mycophenolate or azathioprine: systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective. The objective of this study was to summarize the comparative efficacy and safety of MMF and AZA as maintenance therapy for LN. Methods. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of MMF and AZA as maintenance therapy for LN were performed based on a sensitive search. Meta-regression was used to explore causes of heterogeneity. Safety was explored using crude an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
دوره 2 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007